[Geomoose-users] Culling Trac

[Dan Little]

Trunk should probably be a discussion on the list, however, generally, bugs in trunk are not really considered bugs until an RC1 or DR1 has been stamped.



>________________________________
>From: Brian Fischer <bfischer at houstoneng.com>
>To: Brian Fischer <bfischer at houstoneng.com>; Brent Fraser <bfraser at geoanalytic.com>; Dan Little <danlittle at yahoo.com>
>Cc: GeoMOOSE Users List <geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 1:25 PM
>Subject: RE: [Geomoose-users] Culling Trac
>
>
> 
>Since we are in between migrating Trac.  Where should we report bugs for the current code that is in trunk?  Or should I just hold them until OSGeo get’s trac setup for us?  I’m beginning to test things.
> 
>Brian Fischer, CFM
>GIS Manager 
>Houston Engineering, Inc.
>O763.493.4522 | D 763.493.6664 | M 763.229.2734
> 
>From:geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Brian Fischer
>Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 9:50 PM
>To: Brent Fraser; Dan Little
>Cc: GeoMOOSE Users List
>Subject: RE: [Geomoose-users] Culling Trac
> 
>Once we have a 2.6 up and running I would be willing to go through them and see if they are still valid or if they can be closed.
> 
>Brian Fischer, CFM
>GIS Manager 
>Houston Engineering, Inc.
>O763.493.4522 | D 763.493.6664 | M 763.229.2734
> 
>From:geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Brent Fraser
>Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 2:11 PM
>To: Dan Little
>Cc: GeoMOOSE Users List
>Subject: Re: [Geomoose-users] Culling Trac
> 
>Duck,
>
>  Six of the tickets I've submitted are still open, but I don't know if they will be fixed as a side-effect of the re-work for 2.6.  If most (all?) of the code for 2.6 is now in trunk, I could try to reproduce them....
>
>
> 
>Ticket Summary 
>#97 Identify Attributes on a WMS not finding the feature 
>#119 Printing WMS layer does not work if requested projection different from view 
>#121 Feature Editor - Missing Required Field 
>#39 popups fail if layer coordinate system different from map coordinate system 
>#98 Identify Attributes on a WMS requires a return type of application/vnd.ogc.gml 
> 
>Ticket Summary 
>#5 Editing complex polygons and lines in Internet Explorer 
>
>
>
>Best Regards,
>Brent Fraser
>
>On 9/19/2011 12:28 PM, Dan Little wrote: 
>PSC,
> 
>Can we get some lists built for what Trac tickets are important and/or still apply?
> 
>I think that we should probably have two categories:
> 
>A) 2.4 bug(s) that should be fixed. This implies that a 2.4.1 release is important and should be done.
>B) Bugs/Enhancements that are important for 2.6.
> 
>It may be worthwhile to categorize the other tickets or justify why they are being dropped.  I believe many will simply be subsumed by 2.6 functionality but that is not going to be universally true.
> 
>Users,
> 
>Input is also worthwhile here.
> 
>-Duck
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Geomoose-users mailing list
>Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
>http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20110921/19e9fc63/attachment-0001.html