[Geomoose-users] Culling Trac

[Brian Fischer]

Since we are in between migrating Trac.  Where should we report bugs for the current code that is in trunk?  Or should I just hold them until OSGeo get's trac setup for us?  I'm beginning to test things.

Brian Fischer, CFM
GIS Manager
Houston Engineering, Inc.
O 763.493.4522 | D 763.493.6664 | M 763.229.2734

From: geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Brian Fischer
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 9:50 PM
To: Brent Fraser; Dan Little
Cc: GeoMOOSE Users List
Subject: RE: [Geomoose-users] Culling Trac

Once we have a 2.6 up and running I would be willing to go through them and see if they are still valid or if they can be closed.

Brian Fischer, CFM
GIS Manager
Houston Engineering, Inc.
O 763.493.4522 | D 763.493.6664 | M 763.229.2734

From: geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Brent Fraser
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 2:11 PM
To: Dan Little
Cc: GeoMOOSE Users List
Subject: Re: [Geomoose-users] Culling Trac

Duck,

  Six of the tickets I've submitted are still open, but I don't know if they will be fixed as a side-effect of the re-work for 2.6.  If most (all?) of the code for 2.6 is now in trunk, I could try to reproduce them....


Ticket<http://www.geomoose.org/trac/query?status=accepted&status=assigned&status=needs_work&status=new&status=reopened&status=testing&group=reporter&col=id&col=summary&order=id>

Summary<http://www.geomoose.org/trac/query?status=accepted&status=assigned&status=needs_work&status=new&status=reopened&status=testing&group=reporter&col=id&col=summary&order=summary>

#97<http://www.geomoose.org/trac/ticket/97>

Identify Attributes on a WMS not finding the feature<http://www.geomoose.org/trac/ticket/97>

#119<http://www.geomoose.org/trac/ticket/119>

Printing WMS layer does not work if requested projection different from view<http://www.geomoose.org/trac/ticket/119>

#121<http://www.geomoose.org/trac/ticket/121>

Feature Editor - Missing Required Field<http://www.geomoose.org/trac/ticket/121>

#39<http://www.geomoose.org/trac/ticket/39>

popups fail if layer coordinate system different from map coordinate system<http://www.geomoose.org/trac/ticket/39>

#98<http://www.geomoose.org/trac/ticket/98>

Identify Attributes on a WMS requires a return type of application/vnd.ogc.gml<http://www.geomoose.org/trac/ticket/98>


Ticket<http://www.geomoose.org/trac/query?status=accepted&status=assigned&status=needs_work&status=new&status=reopened&status=testing&group=reporter&col=id&col=summary&order=id>

Summary<http://www.geomoose.org/trac/query?status=accepted&status=assigned&status=needs_work&status=new&status=reopened&status=testing&group=reporter&col=id&col=summary&order=summary>

#5<http://www.geomoose.org/trac/ticket/5>

Editing complex polygons and lines in Internet Explorer<http://www.geomoose.org/trac/ticket/5>




Best Regards,

Brent Fraser

On 9/19/2011 12:28 PM, Dan Little wrote:
PSC,

Can we get some lists built for what Trac tickets are important and/or still apply?

I think that we should probably have two categories:

A) 2.4 bug(s) that should be fixed. This implies that a 2.4.1 release is important and should be done.
B) Bugs/Enhancements that are important for 2.6.

It may be worthwhile to categorize the other tickets or justify why they are being dropped.  I believe many will simply be subsumed by 2.6 functionality but that is not going to be universally true.

Users,

Input is also worthwhile here.

-Duck



_______________________________________________

Geomoose-users mailing list

Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org>

http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20110921/e717dc3c/attachment-0001.html