[Geomoose-users] GeoMOOSE RFC 1
Jim Klassen
klassen.js at gmail.com
Wed Sep 21 11:25:52 EDT 2011
IIRC, MapServer allows RFCs to be developed and commented on in Trac and only copies them into SVN once (voted) approved. I don't think this violates Dean's suggestion because Trac is still on the GeoMOOSE site, but it does lessen the burden for non-committers to propose an RFC. (As long as we consider the OSGeo stuff part of the GeoMoose site.)
On Sep 21, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Eli Adam wrote:
> These suggestions seem reasonable to me. It does put a slight burden on a committer to put the RFC into SVN, however, it also provides a slight benefit by having it properly documented rather than free text in email or wiki. The suggested addition encourages discussion and provides for proper list archiving.
>
> If no one else comments on the suggested changes, I'll update the RFC on the website in a day or so.
>
> Eli
>
> "Anderson, Dean" <anderson.dean at co.polk.or.us> wrote:
>> Sorry I missed the meeting last week. Looks good for a process. I would
>> like to see more clarification regarding the detailed process.
>>
>> OLD---
>>
>> Proposals need to be available for review for at least two business days
>> before a final decision can be made.
>>
>> PROPOSED--
>>
>> Proposals need to be available for review AS AN RFC POSTED ON THE GEOMOOSE
>> SITE for at least two business days before a final decision can be made.
>>
>> PLEASE ADD BULLET
>>
>> All discussions regarding the RFC should be made to the geomoose
>> listserver.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geomoose-users mailing list
> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
More information about the Geomoose-users
mailing list