[Geomoose-users] 2.6 - To Doc? To Purge? To Release?

[Ed Boesenberg]

I will be upgrading all of my GM apps to the 2.6 version, so I have no
objections.

 

I would be happy to help write some of the docs, I would need someone to
point me in the right direction.

 

Ed

 

 

 

 

From: geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Dan Little
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 10:19 AM
To: GeoMOOSE Users List
Subject: [Geomoose-users] 2.6 - To Doc? To Purge? To Release?

 

Hello List,

 

We are getting *very* comfortable with the status of the code for the new
GeoMoose 2.6 release.

 

A demo is available here:

- http://www.geomoose.org/demo/geomoose.html

 

The current state of the documentation is here:

- http://www.geomoose.org/trunk/

 

A relevant change log is here:

- http://www.geomoose.org/trunk/releases/2.6.html

 

Currently, the docs contain a substantial amount of legacy instructions from
older versions of GeoMoose.  We have moved to a versioned documentation
system and the old docs will be preserved here:

- http://www.geomoose.org/2.4/

 

"geomoose.org/" really just points to the latest stable documentation.

 

Does anyone have an objection to cleaning up the docs to *only* apply to
2.6?  My motivation is clarity.  2.6 simplifies installation quite a bit but
it also deprecates a few functions and I'd rather not have too much "diff
docing" going on as it can confuse new users.

 

We will be dropping an RC1 pending a few tickets.  Most of the docs will
continue to apply but we are also looking for volunteers who are unafraid of
writing docs and looking at some code.

 

Thanks for any input!

 

-Duck

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20120412/fca84ea3/attachment-0001.html