[Geomoose-users] requested image size 2.6 vs 2.2

[Jim Klassen]

Now I am confused.  Are you accessing  TileCache or MapServer?

Type=wms is preferred in 2.6 over type=mapserver presuming you are accessing Mapserver/WMS.

TileCache/MapCache/OpenStreetMap tiles/etc. would typically use a different type.  I don't have my computer in front of me to check which one.

On Oct 4, 2012, at 7:50, Matej Mailing <mailing at tam.si> wrote:

> I have type="mapserver" and the path to the mapfile within the file.
> Is tiled=true available only for type="wms"? I have output already set
> as WMS in the mapfile, can I use it somehow?
> 
> Thanks,
> Matej
> 
> 2012/10/4 Jim Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com>:
>> You're likely something wrong.  Do you have tiled=true set in the mapbook?
>> 
>> On Oct 3, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Matej Mailing wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I would also be interested in this solution. Currently it seems
>>> tilecache doesn't work - when moving map the surrounding views are
>>> "not loaded". Is this normal behaviour or am I doing something wrong?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Matej
>>> 
>>> 2012/9/24 Mark Volz <MarkVolz at co.lyon.mn.us>:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> 
>>>> GeoMOOSE appears to request a larger image than what was displayed on the map.  This allows for a user to pan around slightly before a new image would need to be requested from the server.  It also makes tilled images appear much faster - since the tiles would start to load before a user could pan to the area.  Is there any way to configure 2.6 so that we can request larger images so that GM 2.6 behaves more like 2.2?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Mark Volz
>>>> GIS Specialist
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Geomoose-users mailing list
>>>> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Geomoose-users mailing list
>>> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>>