[Geomoose-users] Incubation - Continued . . . .

[Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)]

All,

I'm in agreement here.   I see the recording aspects fully realized via the mail list, possibly with some special Title to the email thread, but nothing much further than that as a required item in the process.

If there is agreement there, we could just start up an email thread to that effect, and have the pertinent folks vote "+1" on it to get something together to point at.  Then it just needs to be pointed at in one of the pages that Eli pointed out earlier as being a logical spot for this type of listing.

Bobb



>>  -----Original Message-----
>>  From: Jim Klassen [mailto:klassen.js at gmail.com]
>>  Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 1:38 PM
>>  To: eadam at co.lincoln.or.us
>>  Cc: Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul); geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>  Subject: Re: [Geomoose-users] Incubation - Continued . . . .
>>  
>>  >
>>  > I recall some lack of interest in keeping track of signed
>>  papers.  If
>>  > people don't like that route, we can also look at the GDAL
>>  example,
>>  > which is RFC3, http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc3_commiters
>>  and GDAL
>>  > does the paperwork/archiving on the mailing list (new
>>  contributors
>>  > must acknowledge on the email list that they will follow RFC3).
>>  
>>  I prefer the GDAL/MapServer method to the OpenLayers method.
>>  Signing and faxing in documents somehow seems rather burdonsome.
>>  
>>