[Geomoose-users] Mutual exclusion & tarball "errors"

James Klassen klassen.js at gmail.com
Tue Oct 14 07:55:01 PDT 2014


Thanks for the report and confirmation.
On Oct 14, 2014 1:32 AM, "Raffaele Morelli" <raffaele.morelli at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 13/10/14 at 10:58am, James Klassen wrote:
> > I'm not sure what happened with the geomoose-2.7.tar.gz file.  That file
> > as it is on the server isn't what is produced from the build scripts.  I
> > re-ran the build scripts and made geomoose-2.7.0.tar.gz and updated the
> > link on the download page.
> >
> > It looks like that tarball is some strange mix of the git tree (which
> > was reorganized for 2.7) and the distribution tarball (which should be
> > the same structure as in 2.6).
> >
> > 1) maps shouldn't be nested
> > 2) php should be a directory in htdocs (not a symlink)
> > 3) services shouldn't exist in the tarball (it does exist in git)
> > 4) htdocs/js should just be htdocs.
>
> Tested and now everything it's in its right place. Got it up and running
> in a
> couple of minutes.
>
> Regards
> /raffaele
>
> --
> « Nunc est bibendum, nunc pede libero pulsanda tellus »
> _______________________________________________
> Geomoose-users mailing list
> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20141014/912c7fd8/attachment.html>


More information about the Geomoose-users mailing list