[Geomoose-users] More RFC 4 Work in Action

Dan Little theduckylittle at gmail.com
Thu Dec 10 11:38:31 PST 2015


Yes I did.
On Dec 10, 2015 1:37 PM, "Eli Adam" <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:

> I think that you mean RFC5 in the subject.
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > 1. The grid now supports selections.
> > 2. There is now support for a toolbar to do something with those
> selections.
>
> Cool.
>
> >
> > At this point, I'll need to switch gears back to GeoMOOSE 2.8.2 (and
> talk to Jim about whether it really is a 2.9.0, Hi Jim!).
> >
> > Some features that are missing:
> > (a) The highlight tool is only returning features and not returning the
> selection polygon or buffer space right now.
>
> I've always thought that this should be a config in the mapbook,
> especially the selection polygon (maybe,
>
> "include_odd_confusing_random_shape_on_top_of_map_that_otherwise_makes_sense"
> - well you get my opinion of selection polygon).
>
> > (b) There is no grid/map interaction via selection on the grid or
> hovering.  I know we should have something but I might punt that to another
> version to release this functionality and let people start playing with it.
>
> Benefits and drawbacks each way.  There is more design flexibility
> before releasing it.  Getting it out is good too.
>
> >
> > Thanks Everyone!
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:05 AM, James Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > New features would be 2.9.
> >
> > The MS4W mapfile fix by itself might be worth a 2.8.2.
>
> I'm still not entirely clear if it is a universal fix for all data
> source types.  I do think that it is an important fix.
>
> >
> > (First time was oversize with the reply quoted)
>
> Maybe some recent list infrastructure migrations changed the default
> message size?  There was a 500kb image which would be a lot of ascii
> text.
>
> Best regards, Eli
>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Geomoose-users mailing list
> > Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20151210/26bb62c3/attachment.html>


More information about the Geomoose-users mailing list