[Geomoose-users] WFS in GM3

[TC Haddad]

Yep, the WFS draws nicely from the GML response, so in that way,
projections are all happy...



On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Does the WFS layer *draw* on the map? (Define some styles,and then add a
> catalog item for it.)
>
> I suspect a projections issue as well. The reason the query happens in
> 4326 is due to some MapServer projection bugs that I had found while doing
> the dev work.  The easiest way to handle it was to use 4326 for the query.
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 3:32 PM, TC Haddad <tchaddad at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm working my way through setting up GM3 with some local parcel data,
>> and am having issues with the portions that use WFS. Here's what's
>> happening:
>>
>> - local data draws fine
>>
>> - Identify uses WMS GetFeatureInfo, and works fine
>>
>> - Search and Select both use WFS and seem to generate valid queries. They
>> do not return an error when used, but do return an empty set of results.
>>
>> troubleshooting:
>>
>> - Search: figured out that there was a hard-coded field name in search.js
>> that wasn't mentioned in the docs, but after fixing that, I'm still not
>> getting any results from search...
>>
>> - Select: seems to be passing valid coordinates in 4326 to the WFS. The
>> data is in 3857. The data is drawing correctly so I'm assuming the map file
>> is fine, but no results come back, so wondering about projection issues for
>> this one...
>>
>>
>> Any ideas where else I can look for issues?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geomoose-users mailing list
>> Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20170828/0092942b/attachment.html>