[GeoNode-devel] 2.4.x Branch

[Jeffrey Johnson]

Note Im not sure we agreed to do the even/odd numbering. Im in favor,
but I think we may need some more discussion before moving in this
direction.

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 for a 2.4 branch.  Note that at some point we agreed on using the
> even/odd strategy [1] for GeoNode releases, so our next stable release
> would be 2.6 (bug fix releases would be .z, i.e. 2.4.1, etc.).
>
> Comments?  Should we have this documented somewhere?
>
> ..Tom
>
> [1]
> http://producingoss.com/en/development-cycle.html#release-number-even-odd-strategy
>
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2015, Ariel Nunez wrote:
>
>> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 19:47:53 -0500
>> From: Ariel Nunez <ingenieroariel at gmail.com>
>> To: Patrick Dufour <pjdufour.dev at gmail.com>
>> Cc: geonode-devel <geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
>> Subject: Re: [GeoNode-devel] 2.4.x Branch
>>
>>
>> I believe this is a good idea too.
>>
>> -a
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Patrick Dufour <pjdufour.dev at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We should create a 2.4.x branch on the main GeoNode repo like we have for
>>> 2.0.x.;  unless we have a different plan underway to support 2.4 and 2.5.
>>>
>>> I did miss the road mapping day of the recent GeoNode code sprint,
>>> though.  My ideas might be out of date.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Patrick Dufour
>
> _______________________________________________
> geonode-devel mailing list
> geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel