[GeoNode-devel] 2.4.x Branch

[Ariel Nunez]

I am also in favor of even/odd, and releasing a 2.4.1 with bugfixes.

Alessio, we need to make sure that the new geoserver artifact does not wipe
out the geoserver data dir on the user's computers. We have tested it with
the geonode debian package but I am not sure it works on the
geoserver-geonode debian package.

Jeff, we talked about even/odd during the code sprint and there seemed to
be agreement in the room. But you are right that it has not received formal
voting. Can we use this thread for people to vote concerns against it or
support or should we do that in a github issue?

-a

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Jeffrey Johnson <ortelius at gmail.com> wrote:

> Note Im not sure we agreed to do the even/odd numbering. Im in favor,
> but I think we may need some more discussion before moving in this
> direction.
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 for a 2.4 branch.  Note that at some point we agreed on using the
> > even/odd strategy [1] for GeoNode releases, so our next stable release
> > would be 2.6 (bug fix releases would be .z, i.e. 2.4.1, etc.).
> >
> > Comments?  Should we have this documented somewhere?
> >
> > ..Tom
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://producingoss.com/en/development-cycle.html#release-number-even-odd-strategy
> >
> > On Tue, 1 Dec 2015, Ariel Nunez wrote:
> >
> >> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 19:47:53 -0500
> >> From: Ariel Nunez <ingenieroariel at gmail.com>
> >> To: Patrick Dufour <pjdufour.dev at gmail.com>
> >> Cc: geonode-devel <geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
> >> Subject: Re: [GeoNode-devel] 2.4.x Branch
> >>
> >>
> >> I believe this is a good idea too.
> >>
> >> -a
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Patrick Dufour <pjdufour.dev at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> We should create a 2.4.x branch on the main GeoNode repo like we have
> for
> >>> 2.0.x.;  unless we have a different plan underway to support 2.4 and
> 2.5.
> >>>
> >>> I did miss the road mapping day of the recent GeoNode code sprint,
> >>> though.  My ideas might be out of date.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Patrick Dufour
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > geonode-devel mailing list
> > geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geonode-devel/attachments/20151202/93717eb3/attachment-0001.html>