[GeoNode-devel] 2.4.x Branch

[Alessio Fabiani]

It should not, the GeoServer version is the same train. There can be an
issue if the users run a "paver setup" command maybe, which (as far as I
remember) deletes the GeoServer Data Dir.

==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information.
==

Ing. Alessio Fabiani
@alfa7691
Founder/Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054  Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax:     +39 0584 1660272
mob:   +39  331 6233686

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

-------------------------------------------------------

*AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003*

Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.



The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
(Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Ariel Nunez <ingenieroariel at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I am also in favor of even/odd, and releasing a 2.4.1 with bugfixes.
>
> Alessio, we need to make sure that the new geoserver artifact does not
> wipe out the geoserver data dir on the user's computers. We have tested it
> with the geonode debian package but I am not sure it works on the
> geoserver-geonode debian package.
>
> Jeff, we talked about even/odd during the code sprint and there seemed to
> be agreement in the room. But you are right that it has not received formal
> voting. Can we use this thread for people to vote concerns against it or
> support or should we do that in a github issue?
>
> -a
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Jeffrey Johnson <ortelius at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Note Im not sure we agreed to do the even/odd numbering. Im in favor,
>> but I think we may need some more discussion before moving in this
>> direction.
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 for a 2.4 branch.  Note that at some point we agreed on using the
>> > even/odd strategy [1] for GeoNode releases, so our next stable release
>> > would be 2.6 (bug fix releases would be .z, i.e. 2.4.1, etc.).
>> >
>> > Comments?  Should we have this documented somewhere?
>> >
>> > ..Tom
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> http://producingoss.com/en/development-cycle.html#release-number-even-odd-strategy
>> >
>> > On Tue, 1 Dec 2015, Ariel Nunez wrote:
>> >
>> >> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 19:47:53 -0500
>> >> From: Ariel Nunez <ingenieroariel at gmail.com>
>> >> To: Patrick Dufour <pjdufour.dev at gmail.com>
>> >> Cc: geonode-devel <geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
>> >> Subject: Re: [GeoNode-devel] 2.4.x Branch
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I believe this is a good idea too.
>> >>
>> >> -a
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Patrick Dufour <pjdufour.dev at gmail.com
>> >
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> We should create a 2.4.x branch on the main GeoNode repo like we have
>> for
>> >>> 2.0.x.;  unless we have a different plan underway to support 2.4 and
>> 2.5.
>> >>>
>> >>> I did miss the road mapping day of the recent GeoNode code sprint,
>> >>> though.  My ideas might be out of date.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks!
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards,
>> >>> Patrick Dufour
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > geonode-devel mailing list
>> > geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geonode-devel mailing list
> geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geonode-devel/attachments/20151202/b5a9eee8/attachment-0001.html>