[GeoNode-devel] 2.4.x Branch

Wed Dec 2 06:56:45 PST 2015

+1 for even/odd and for 2.4.1 release
cheers
p

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Alessio Fabiani
<alessio.fabiani at geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> It should not, the GeoServer version is the same train. There can be an
> issue if the users run a "paver setup" command maybe, which (as far as I
> remember) deletes the GeoServer Data Dir.
>
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
> http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information.
> ==
>
> Ing. Alessio Fabiani
> @alfa7691
> Founder/Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
> Italy
> phone: +39 0584 962313
> fax:     +39 0584 1660272
> mob:   +39  331 6233686
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003
>
> Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i
> file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro
> utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le
> finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio
> senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia
> via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso,
> cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo
> anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per
> finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati
> dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>
>
>
> The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
> the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
> proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
> (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
> Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
> copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
> strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
> addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
> immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
> information in this message that has been received in error. The sender does
> not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
> completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
> made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
> e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Ariel Nunez <ingenieroariel at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I am also in favor of even/odd, and releasing a 2.4.1 with bugfixes.
>>
>> Alessio, we need to make sure that the new geoserver artifact does not
>> wipe out the geoserver data dir on the user's computers. We have tested it
>> with the geonode debian package but I am not sure it works on the
>> geoserver-geonode debian package.
>>
>> Jeff, we talked about even/odd during the code sprint and there seemed to
>> be agreement in the room. But you are right that it has not received formal
>> voting. Can we use this thread for people to vote concerns against it or
>> support or should we do that in a github issue?
>>
>> -a
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Jeffrey Johnson <ortelius at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Note Im not sure we agreed to do the even/odd numbering. Im in favor,
>>> but I think we may need some more discussion before moving in this
>>> direction.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > +1 for a 2.4 branch.  Note that at some point we agreed on using the
>>> > even/odd strategy [1] for GeoNode releases, so our next stable release
>>> > would be 2.6 (bug fix releases would be .z, i.e. 2.4.1, etc.).
>>> >
>>> > Comments?  Should we have this documented somewhere?
>>> >
>>> > ..Tom
>>> >
>>> > [1]
>>> >
>>> > http://producingoss.com/en/development-cycle.html#release-number-even-odd-strategy
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, 1 Dec 2015, Ariel Nunez wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 19:47:53 -0500
>>> >> From: Ariel Nunez <ingenieroariel at gmail.com>
>>> >> To: Patrick Dufour <pjdufour.dev at gmail.com>
>>> >> Cc: geonode-devel <geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
>>> >> Subject: Re: [GeoNode-devel] 2.4.x Branch
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> I believe this is a good idea too.
>>> >>
>>> >> -a
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Patrick Dufour
>>> >> <pjdufour.dev at gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> We should create a 2.4.x branch on the main GeoNode repo like we have
>>> >>> for
>>> >>> 2.0.x.;  unless we have a different plan underway to support 2.4 and
>>> >>> 2.5.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I did miss the road mapping day of the recent GeoNode code sprint,
>>> >>> though.  My ideas might be out of date.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thanks!
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Regards,
>>> >>> Patrick Dufour
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > geonode-devel mailing list
>>> > geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>>> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geonode-devel mailing list
>> geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geonode-devel mailing list
> geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
>


-- 
Paolo Corti
Geospatial software developer
web: http://www.paolocorti.net
twitter: @capooti
skype: capooti