[GeoNode-devel] 2.4.x Branch

Wed Dec 2 07:22:18 PST 2015

By even/odd, do you mean bug fixes would be,

2.4.1, 2.4.3, 2.4.5, 2.4.7, etc.

And that the stable releases will be:

2.6.0, 2.8.0, 2.10.0, 2.12.0, etc.

Or some other sequence.

In regards, to the top number, I'd vote to stay on 2.x.x for a while and
only migrate to 3.x.x when there's a massive change.
On Dec 2, 2015 9:57 AM, "Paolo Corti" <pcorti at gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 for even/odd and for 2.4.1 release
> cheers
> p
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Alessio Fabiani
> <alessio.fabiani at geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> > It should not, the GeoServer version is the same train. There can be an
> > issue if the users run a "paver setup" command maybe, which (as far as I
> > remember) deletes the GeoServer Data Dir.
> >
> > ==
> > GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
> > http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information.
> > ==
> >
> > Ing. Alessio Fabiani
> > @alfa7691
> > Founder/Technical Lead
> >
> > GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> > Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
> > 55054  Massarosa (LU)
> > Italy
> > phone: +39 0584 962313
> > fax:     +39 0584 1660272
> > mob:   +39 331 6233686
> >
> > http://www.geo-solutions.it
> > http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003
> >
> > Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
> nel/i
> > file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro
> > utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per
> le
> > finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
> messaggio
> > senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene
> notizia
> > via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso,
> > cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
> divulgarlo
> > anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo
> per
> > finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati
> > dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.
> >
> >
> >
> > The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely
> for
> > the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential
> or
> > proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
> > (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
> > Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure,
> reproduction,
> > copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial,
> is
> > strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
> > addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
> > immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
> > information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
> does
> > not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
> > completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
> > made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
> > e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Ariel Nunez <ingenieroariel at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I am also in favor of even/odd, and releasing a 2.4.1 with bugfixes.
> >>
> >> Alessio, we need to make sure that the new geoserver artifact does not
> >> wipe out the geoserver data dir on the user's computers. We have tested
> it
> >> with the geonode debian package but I am not sure it works on the
> >> geoserver-geonode debian package.
> >>
> >> Jeff, we talked about even/odd during the code sprint and there seemed
> to
> >> be agreement in the room. But you are right that it has not received
> formal
> >> voting. Can we use this thread for people to vote concerns against it or
> >> support or should we do that in a github issue?
> >>
> >> -a
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Jeffrey Johnson <ortelius at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Note Im not sure we agreed to do the even/odd numbering. Im in favor,
> >>> but I think we may need some more discussion before moving in this
> >>> direction.
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > +1 for a 2.4 branch.  Note that at some point we agreed on using the
> >>> > even/odd strategy [1] for GeoNode releases, so our next stable
> release
> >>> > would be 2.6 (bug fix releases would be .z, i.e. 2.4.1, etc.).
> >>> >
> >>> > Comments?  Should we have this documented somewhere?
> >>> >
> >>> > ..Tom
> >>> >
> >>> > [1]
> >>> >
> >>> >
> http://producingoss.com/en/development-cycle.html#release-number-even-odd-strategy
> >>> >
> >>> > On Tue, 1 Dec 2015, Ariel Nunez wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 19:47:53 -0500
> >>> >> From: Ariel Nunez <ingenieroariel at gmail.com>
> >>> >> To: Patrick Dufour <pjdufour.dev at gmail.com>
> >>> >> Cc: geonode-devel <geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
> >>> >> Subject: Re: [GeoNode-devel] 2.4.x Branch
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I believe this is a good idea too.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> -a
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Patrick Dufour
> >>> >> <pjdufour.dev at gmail.com>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> We should create a 2.4.x branch on the main GeoNode repo like we
> have
> >>> >>> for
> >>> >>> 2.0.x.;  unless we have a different plan underway to support 2.4
> and
> >>> >>> 2.5.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> I did miss the road mapping day of the recent GeoNode code sprint,
> >>> >>> though.  My ideas might be out of date.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Thanks!
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Regards,
> >>> >>> Patrick Dufour
> >>> >
> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> > geonode-devel mailing list
> >>> > geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> >>> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> geonode-devel mailing list
> >> geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > geonode-devel mailing list
> > geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Paolo Corti
> Geospatial software developer
> web: http://www.paolocorti.net
> twitter: @capooti
> skype: capooti
> _______________________________________________
> geonode-devel mailing list
> geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geonode-devel/attachments/20151202/94de3098/attachment-0001.html>