[GeoNode-devel] Timeslots availability for hangout

[Cristiano Giovando]

Ciao Francesco,

It looks like the dates for that poll have passed. Shall we try again
sometime next week? Here's a new Doodle poll with only five time options,
hopefully that will make it quicker for folks to fill out :)

https://doodle.com/poll/qz8vdqybseeqc2rq

Looking forward to it!

Cristiano

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Francesco Bartoli <xbartolone at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Doodle poll created:
>
> https://doodle.com/poll/g76vsyxp4bm7qarn
>
> Sent from Nylas Mail
> <https://n1.nylas.com/link/86107049b5910f041243745b4389715b1e13601e71129cff19412546b5b567af/0?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fnylas.com%3Fref%3Dn1&recipient=geonode-devel%40lists.osgeo.org>,
> the best free email app for work
>
> On ago 24 2017, at 11:28 pm, Francesco Bartoli <xbartolone at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Great idea Angelos!
>>
>> Ciao
>> Francesco
>>
>> Il 24 ago 2017, 22:04 +0200, Angelos Tzotsos <gcpp.kalxas at gmail.com>, ha
>> scritto:
>>
>> I think we will need a Doodle poll for determining the date/time of the
>> meeting.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 9:38 PM, Francesco Bartoli <xbartolone at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> Following the discussion about geonode-project and the first meeting
>> during the sprint for what the future GeoNode should be, we can follow up
>> with a call in the next days. A tentative agenda should be:
>>
>> 1. GeoNode project (as per Alessio's email)
>> 1.1 Review settings management options and keep it as simpler as possible
>> for downstream project development
>> 1.2 Define clearer the inheritance approach for the above(pinax strategy,
>> others)
>> 1.3 Dependencies management(setup vs requirements)
>>
>> 2. GeoNode future vision
>> 2.1 GeoNode official feature list
>> - What is GeoNode and its architecture (to guide GeoNode’s future API and
>> clearly define what is and isn’t a GeoNode, opening the door for wildly
>> different backend implementations in the future and helping big
>> architecture changes)
>> - Where to track each of them
>> - External tests verifying each of them on an installation build in a
>> continuos integration platform
>> - Officially supported installation procedures (deb packages, osgeo live,
>> pypi, docker, ansible, ubuntu snaps) - Maybe we should have just one or two
>> official ones
>> - Strategies to engage with selected potential new core committers that
>> have been answering mails on the list or submitting good PRs
>>
>> Please express your interest on participation and give a bunch of
>> preferred times. Maybe integrate more topics in the agenda if I forgot
>> something.
>>
>> My +1 and any time after 5pm italian time is good for me
>>
>> Ciao
>> Francesco
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geonode-devel mailing list
>> geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
>> <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel?recipient=geonode-devel%40lists.osgeo.org>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
>> OSGeo Charter Member
>> http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos
>> <http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos?recipient=geonode-devel%40lists.osgeo.org>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> geonode-devel mailing list
> geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geonode-devel/attachments/20170906/2023ae64/attachment.html>