[GeoNode-devel] Docker Strategy Chat

[Toni Schönbuchner]

Hi Olivier,

thanks for sharing your plans. Your ideas read well thought out.
What do you have in mind with:

> We'd need to find a good name for it - suggestions welcome.

A codename like  'GeoNode Pacific' ;)

Or a branch name to just distinguish from master branch?
If so why not just stay close to yours ~ master-spc, or master-le (let´s encrypt).
docker-next or docker+?

Cheers,

Toni


----------------------------------------------
CSGIS

-----------------------------------------------
Kolonnadenstraße 1
04109 Leipzig
-----------------------------------------------
Mobil	+49/ (0) 176 6680 3198
Tel 		+49/ (0) 341 24 04 738
Fax 		+49/ (0) 341 24 04 73
Web		http://csgis.de
-----------------------------------------------

Hinweis gemäß § 33 BDSG
Daten der Verfahrensbeteiligten werden gespeichert. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für den 
Adressaten bestimmt. Der Inhalt der E-Mail ist vertraulich. Falls Sie diese E-Mail versehentlich 
erhalten haben, rufen Sie uns unter obiger Rufnummer umgehend an und löschen Sie diese Nachricht 
von Ihrem Computer. Jegliche Art von Reproduktionen, Verbreitung, Vervielfältigung, Veränderung, 
Verteilung und/oder Veröffentlichung dieser E-Mail ist verboten.

> Am 06.09.2018 um 12:22 schrieb geonode-devel-request at lists.osgeo.org:
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 11:49:31 +1000
> From: Olivier Dalang <olivier.dalang at gmail.com <mailto:olivier.dalang at gmail.com>>
> To: geonode-devel <geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org>>
> Subject: Re: [GeoNode-devel] Docker Strategy Chat
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAExk7p2tzJYbCPG6MahJ3XcqE37B8OXFy9HpexmLWkfa6m2d4g at mail.gmail.com <mailto:CAExk7p2tzJYbCPG6MahJ3XcqE37B8OXFy9HpexmLWkfa6m2d4g at mail.gmail.com>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Hi all !
> 
> Some time has passed since we last discussed deployment with Docker. I'm
> still willing to work on officially supporting docker deployment for
> Geonode.
> 
> To move forward on the docker deployment, I suggest a two phase strategy.
> 
> 1/ copy over the SPCgeonode repo to the geonode organization (more or less
> as is) and document that deployment method as an official one l (but in
> beta state). We'd need to find a good name for it - suggestions welcome.
> 2/ work on making the SPCgeonode setup and the setup in the main repo
> converge, with the end goal of removing the docker deployment repo
> altogether and have everything in the main repo, using the same
> docker-compose, with a docker-compose.deploy.yml that adds deployment
> specific elements (https, backups)
> 
> 1/ could happen very soon (maybe even before next release), while 2/ would
> take more time, as it requires to go carefully through both implementations
> and take the best of both.
> 
> I think this would accommodate both the goal of having a ready deployment
> method soon, and the final goal of having the deployment method use the
> same docker images than dev, without being disruptive for users currently
> relying on the docker images.
> 
> The reason why I think we must do it in 2 steps is that IMO, while good for
> development, the current setup in the main repo still requires significant
> work until it's usable as a base for deployment (docker images are too
> heavy, split across many repos, images not properly versioned,
> non-production ready elements such as static files being served by django,
> no ci, etc.). That's not mentioning the additional steps needed for a
> deployment meeting basic good practice requirements (https, backups...).
> 
> I would definitely be able to support the work on this as part of my
> current activities. I also believe it meets a high demand from the
> community (this is more or less my only serious contribution to Geonode, so
> that I take my election in PSC a clear sign of that demand).
> 
> Francesco, would that 2 steps strategy be OK as you were keen to have the
> spcgeonode setup reuse as much as possible existing docker setups ?
> 
> Let me know what you think. Let's discuss this, and if needed vote during
> next PSC (though if we reach consensus before that it's even better).
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Olivier

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geonode-devel/attachments/20180906/cdea0902/attachment-0001.html>