[geos-devel] Issue with returning Coordinate * rather than value

[David Blasby]

> Coordinate *getAt(int i)  /// Safe
> Coordinate *[int i]   /// DANGER !!!! super fast RAW access

Yes - I like that. The getAt(int) should return a non-pointer or its should allocate a new
Cooridinate and return that.

Is the [int] method going to do range checking or are we just going to assume the caller is
competent?

dave