[geos-devel] Issues with smart pointers and threads?
Martin Davis
mbdavis at VividSolutions.com
Tue May 27 20:28:27 EDT 2003
I agree, Dave - I think that reference counting is going to be a lot harder to implement, debug, and verify than simply using value objects. I'd prefer to avoid as much complexity as possible in GEOS - dealing with the algorithm side of things is complex enough.
Martin Davis, Senior Technical Architect
Vivid Solutions Inc.
Suite #1A-2328 Government Street Victoria, B.C. V8T 5G5
Phone: (250) 385 6040 Fax: (250) 385 6046
EMail: mbdavis at vividsolutions.com Web: www.vividsolutions.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Blasby [mailto:dblasby at refractions.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 5:12 PM
> To: GEOS Development List
> Subject: Re: [geos-devel] Issues with smart pointers and threads?
>
>
> I'm a bit concerned with using the reference counting since it could
> cause us some grief. However, if this open source reference
> counter is
> good this might be easy.
>
> Personally, I think wasting a wee bit of space for the
> precision model
> in a geometry isnt going to be that big a deal.
>
> As for thread-safety, consider this:
>
> Single threaded application makes a PrecisionModel.
> This application forks 2 threads that both have access to this
> PrecisionModel.
> Both threads create a bunch of geometries using the PrecisionModel.
>
> If your reference counting is *not* thread-safe (ie. protected by a
> semephore), then there is a race condition if both threads try to
> increment the reference count at the same time.
>
> dave
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at geos.refractions.net
> http://geos.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>
More information about the geos-devel
mailing list