[geos-devel] [UTF] envelope_class_test.cpp fixed for Boost 1.33

[strk at refractions.net]

Yep, I also feel this is going to be more complex then I imagined.
I always tried to do w/out boost exactly fearing for these kind
of problems (common when external dependencies are added).

Mateusz: how about boost-less port of the JTS unit tests instead ?

--strk;

On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 04:39:27PM -0800, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> The situation in general makes me wary, if Boost is going to changing  
> incompatibly with some regularity.  We want to use it to reduce  
> workload, and it could potentially add workload.
> 
> In the short term, can we simply wait for the 1.34 release as  
> suggested?  We have gotten this far with blackbox testing, we can  
> hold on for a little longer.  It would be interesting to know  
> historically how often Boost has had incompatible changes.
> 
> P
> 
> On 12-Mar-06, at 3:03 PM, Mateusz Łoskot wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'd like to ask you for your opinion about the issue
> >described in this thread.
> >It's very important for me, because I've had to stop portig Unit Tests
> >because I'd like not to do it twice.
> >So, please Leaders, share your ideas.
> >
> >Thanks in advance