[geos-devel] Re: [postgis-devel] Shhhh....

[Paul Ramsey]

No, I mean to say a 3.0.1 release, without prepared geometries.

A 3.1.0 release would seem to be a number of testing and bug closing
iterations aways.

P.

On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Howard Butler <hobu.inc at gmail.com> wrote:
> The 3.0 branch of GEOS does not have anything in it about prepared
> geometries. http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/log/branches/3.0
>
> Did you mean to say release a 3.1 version of GEOS with non-leaky prepared
> geometries?
>
> I don't think we should do minor releases with major features in them.
>
> Howard
>
> On Oct 6, 2008, at 12:17 PM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>
>> I'd like to do 3.0.1. Objections?
>>
>> P.
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 5:02 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim at gunduz.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 19:14 -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>>>
>>>> postgis-trunk + geos-trunk = working, non-leaky prepared geometries
>>>
>>> This reminded me something: Are there any plans for Geos 3.0.1 very
>>> soon? AFAICS from svn logs, there are many many important fixes since
>>> 3.0.0 was released.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> --
>>> Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE
>>> devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
>>>                 http://www.gunduz.org
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> postgis-devel mailing list
>>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geos-devel mailing list
>> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>