[geos-devel] 3.0.3 To Do

[Obe, Regina]

Paul,

Can you try applying this revised attached patch.  I ran into the same
issues you described when trying to apply the tortoise generated patch
to my OpenSUSE VM install.

I used the original patch he sent since didn't want to fuss with
updating trunk and I really don't want geos 3.0 having stuff that trunk
doesn't have.

As a workaround I
1) checked out  geos 3.0 on both OpenSUSE VM and windows
2) patched my windows using tortoise svn with Sanak's patch
3) uploaded changed files to OpenSuse VM
4) Did a svn diff on my OpenSUSE to generate this new patch 

5) To test I wiped out my msvc8 on windows did svn checkout and applied
the patch I created in OpenSuse  and then did a build in VS8 to make
sure it worked.

6) Also did the same thing in OpenSuse

I'm sure there is a more elegant way to do this, but that's the best I
could do with my limited skill set :(. 

Thanks,
Regina

-----Original Message-----
From: geos-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:geos-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Paul Ramsey
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 11:50 AM
To: GEOS Development List
Subject: Re: [geos-devel] 3.0.3 To Do

I tried the earlier one and that didn't work either. I'm suspecting my
OS/X patch is (a) first stripping the CRs from the dos-generated patch
and then (b) not finding any matches in the dos-formatted target file.
I think someone else with a cygwin sandbox should apply this patch.

P.

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Obe, Regina <robe.dnd at cityofboston.gov>
wrote:
> Paul,
>
> The earlier one doesn't add any new files so may be more appropriate.
> This one adds a new geostest folder to the msvc80 and geostest to the
> solution to add the test that Frank was running using make.vc (that
does
> the test.wkt compare thing).
>
> Note:  this geostest isn't even in trunk so I'm questioning if we
really
> want to include it in the geos 3.0 branch. If we do we should include
it
> in trunk to be consistent.
>
> Since we already have a unit test for VC and the unit test is much
> easier to use than the geostest, I question the value of adding this
> extra project to the solution.
>
> Thanks,
> Regina
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geos-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:geos-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Paul Ramsey
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 11:39 AM
> To: GEOS Development List
> Subject: Re: [geos-devel] 3.0.3 To Do
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Obe, Regina
<robe.dnd at cityofboston.gov>
> wrote:
>> Actually which patch are you referring to.  The version one or the
big
>> patch.  I just redownloaded the msvc80 folder from svn that has your
> version
>> patch and then reapplied Sanak's patch and didn't run into any
> conflicts.
>
> this one
> geos-branches-3.0-build-msvc80_add_geostest.patch
>
> should I be doing the earlier one?
>
> P
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
> -----------------------------------------
> The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be
> confidential, legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure
> pursuant to Massachusetts law. It is intended
> solely for the addressee. If you received this in error, please
> contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>
_______________________________________________
geos-devel mailing list
geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: geos_msvc80.diff
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2002 bytes
Desc: geos_msvc80.diff
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/attachments/20081024/63d2ec11/geos_msvc80.obj