[geos-devel] 3.0.3 To Do

Sanak geosanak at gmail.com
Mon Oct 27 10:42:34 EDT 2008


Paul, Regina

Sorry, I am a Windows person, and have few knowledge of *nix and Mac
environment.
So please check Regina's modified patch. Thanks Regina.

On another note, I am a developer of GEOS COM Wrapper(
http://sourceforge.jp/projects/geos-com/) project.
Currently, the geos-com api interface is flat, and sample is VB6 only,
but in the future, I want to apply swig-com(
http://code.google.com/soc/2008/swig/appinfo.html?csaid=39B8865043331AF)
based api,
and add browser sample(use IE + OpenLayers, and has "JTS Test Builder"-like
user interface).
Please look forward to it!

Regards,

2008/10/25 Obe, Regina <robe.dnd at cityofboston.gov>

> Paul,
>
> Can you try applying this revised attached patch.  I ran into the same
> issues you described when trying to apply the tortoise generated patch
> to my OpenSUSE VM install.
>
> I used the original patch he sent since didn't want to fuss with
> updating trunk and I really don't want geos 3.0 having stuff that trunk
> doesn't have.
>
> As a workaround I
> 1) checked out  geos 3.0 on both OpenSUSE VM and windows
> 2) patched my windows using tortoise svn with Sanak's patch
> 3) uploaded changed files to OpenSuse VM
> 4) Did a svn diff on my OpenSUSE to generate this new patch
>
> 5) To test I wiped out my msvc8 on windows did svn checkout and applied
> the patch I created in OpenSuse  and then did a build in VS8 to make
> sure it worked.
>
> 6) Also did the same thing in OpenSuse
>
> I'm sure there is a more elegant way to do this, but that's the best I
> could do with my limited skill set :(.
>
> Thanks,
> Regina
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geos-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:geos-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Paul Ramsey
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 11:50 AM
> To: GEOS Development List
> Subject: Re: [geos-devel] 3.0.3 To Do
>
> I tried the earlier one and that didn't work either. I'm suspecting my
> OS/X patch is (a) first stripping the CRs from the dos-generated patch
> and then (b) not finding any matches in the dos-formatted target file.
> I think someone else with a cygwin sandbox should apply this patch.
>
> P.
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Obe, Regina <robe.dnd at cityofboston.gov>
> wrote:
> > Paul,
> >
> > The earlier one doesn't add any new files so may be more appropriate.
> > This one adds a new geostest folder to the msvc80 and geostest to the
> > solution to add the test that Frank was running using make.vc (that
> does
> > the test.wkt compare thing).
> >
> > Note:  this geostest isn't even in trunk so I'm questioning if we
> really
> > want to include it in the geos 3.0 branch. If we do we should include
> it
> > in trunk to be consistent.
> >
> > Since we already have a unit test for VC and the unit test is much
> > easier to use than the geostest, I question the value of adding this
> > extra project to the solution.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Regina
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: geos-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> > [mailto:geos-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Paul Ramsey
> > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 11:39 AM
> > To: GEOS Development List
> > Subject: Re: [geos-devel] 3.0.3 To Do
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Obe, Regina
> <robe.dnd at cityofboston.gov>
> > wrote:
> >> Actually which patch are you referring to.  The version one or the
> big
> >> patch.  I just redownloaded the msvc80 folder from svn that has your
> > version
> >> patch and then reapplied Sanak's patch and didn't run into any
> > conflicts.
> >
> > this one
> > geos-branches-3.0-build-msvc80_add_geostest.patch
> >
> > should I be doing the earlier one?
> >
> > P
> > _______________________________________________
> > geos-devel mailing list
> > geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
> > -----------------------------------------
> > The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be
> > confidential, legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure
> > pursuant to Massachusetts law. It is intended
> > solely for the addressee. If you received this in error, please
> > contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
> > _______________________________________________
> > geos-devel mailing list
> > geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/attachments/20081027/1dbea4da/attachment.html


More information about the geos-devel mailing list