[geos-devel] Approaches for ZM and beyond

[Mateusz Loskot]

On 5 March 2013 19:53, Tyler Mitchell <Tyler.Mitchell at actian.com> wrote:

>
> What are GEOS users and devs doing to enable M measures in their
> GEOS-backed solutions?  I won't worry about specialised functions at this
> point, but at least being able to reliably handle and maintain all XYZM
> ordinates is important for me.  Is it such a lot of work that it's not
> worth adding this to GEOS?  I saw a few messages in the archives looking at
> how to add measures but it wasn't encouraging ;)
>
> Do you think GEOS will support all the SFSQL 1.2 types?
>

Tyler,

These two may be of interest
- interest sampling, no responses
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/2011-December/005591.html
- more in-depth insights
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/2012-July/005959.html

Are people moving to Boost or CGAL instead?
>

I don't see a wave of migration from one to another.
It all depends on many aspects, but code diversity is certainly a good
thing.

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/attachments/20130305/955675df/attachment.html>