[geos-devel] Approaches for ZM and beyond

[luca paganotti]

Sorry for jumping in,

look also at Mike Toews thread on 7/10/2012, i think that we will not see
full ZM support for some time ...



On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Mateusz Loskot <mateusz at loskot.net> wrote:

> On 5 March 2013 19:53, Tyler Mitchell <Tyler.Mitchell at actian.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> What are GEOS users and devs doing to enable M measures in their
>> GEOS-backed solutions?  I won't worry about specialised functions at this
>> point, but at least being able to reliably handle and maintain all XYZM
>> ordinates is important for me.  Is it such a lot of work that it's not
>> worth adding this to GEOS?  I saw a few messages in the archives looking at
>> how to add measures but it wasn't encouraging ;)
>>
>> Do you think GEOS will support all the SFSQL 1.2 types?
>>
>
> Tyler,
>
> These two may be of interest
> - interest sampling, no responses
> http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/2011-December/005591.html
> - more in-depth insights
>  http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/2012-July/005959.html
>
> Are people moving to Boost or CGAL instead?
>>
>
> I don't see a wave of migration from one to another.
> It all depends on many aspects, but code diversity is certainly a good
> thing.
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/attachments/20130305/d428dc8a/attachment.html>