[geos-devel] Death to auto_ptr?

Paul Ramsey pramsey at cleverelephant.ca
Tue Jan 29 11:56:54 PST 2019

Ah, yes, I had svn-3.5 checked out when I was running those searches. Whooops. 

Not much objection to getting rid of the typedefs [2] that I can see. Unless we really thing c++ is going to change the smart pointer implementations yet again. (an open question, I suppose)


[2] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/2018-December/008750.html

> On Jan 29, 2019, at 11:53 AM, Daniel Baston <dbaston at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think auto_ptr has been removed from master already, no? I'd prefer to lose the typedefs as well, but last time we brought that up I recall there being some disagreement.
> Dan
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 2:19 PM Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca <mailto:pramsey at cleverelephant.ca>> wrote:
> Any reason not to renovate the code base and remote the various uses
> of auto_ptr in favour of unique_ptr and strip out the various typedefs
> at the same time so that we uniformly just use std::unique_ptr<> right
> in code where folks can see it?
> P.
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel>_______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/attachments/20190129/e55b002e/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the geos-devel mailing list