[geos-devel] OverlayNG for Testing

[rmrodriguez at carto.com]

Hi there,

> It's probably not complete, but it's got the big entries...

I reported a couple of issues on GEOS trac. Is that good or is there a
more convenient place to track OverlayNG issues?

On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 10:48 PM Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca> wrote:
>
> Here's a spreadsheet...
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15Jk5cNuYdxPPA9fXIxCreRJNlkQZjc2KdYaX-odW8So/edit#gid=936876052
>
> It's probably not complete, but it's got the big entries...
>
> > On Aug 6, 2020, at 1:08 PM, Sandro Santilli <strk at kbt.io> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 06:04:11PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> >
> >> On a similar note, Martin has recovered the old behaviour for linstrings in overlays so we should be able to be back-compatible there too. As with the collections, there's an existing mechanism to get "nicer" behaviour already, the ST_Linemerge function.
> >>
> >> My hope is that, if we do these pieces to get old semantics, we will just be left with adding in the Z handling and be very very close to original semantics, enough so that we can stamp it 3.9 instead of 4.0. I love backwards compatibility on principle.
> >
> > Do you have an updated list of tasks to complete to get backward
> > compatibility in place ? I probably have the possibility to work
> > on some of them.
> >
> > --strk;
> > _______________________________________________
> > geos-devel mailing list
> > geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel



-- 
Raúl Marín Rodríguez
carto.com