[geos-devel] Update to 3.9?

[Martin Davis]

Good point - I didn't see that additional semantic to your PR.  No harm in
having such a method.  Not sure about the naming, though.

On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 7:00 PM Daniel Baston <dbaston at gmail.com> wrote:

> Of all the design decisions made in the white heat of the development of
>> the initial release of JTS, the ordering of arguments to the Envelope
>> constructor is one I regret most.  Don't see a way to change it now though
>> (ideas welcome).
>>
>
> I've been thinking of an alternate way to construct an envelope when you
> know which of your inputs is the min. Currently GEOS assumes they're
> unordered and checks which x value is the min and which is the max, so
> there is a tiny optimization potential here. We could kill two birds with
> one stone and "fix" the ordering:
>
> https://github.com/libgeos/geos/pull/356
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geos-devel/attachments/20201128/3db4c925/attachment.html>