[geos-devel] GEOS NG Regression Review

Sandro Santilli strk at kbt.io
Thu Sep 17 08:18:30 PDT 2020


On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 06:55:16AM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Sep 17, 2020, at 6:54 AM, Sandro Santilli <strk at kbt.io> wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 01:25:39PM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> >> 
> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TDm2aR4a7O41-soS-25Xog1EdQcjmvKCnKltxjbxOC0/edit#
> >> 
> > 
> >> * Despite worries, only one file in topology showed any differences. topogeo_addlinestring.sql needs to be looked at by a topology expert, Sandro do you think you could?
> > 
> > A quick look suggests this is just a lack of normalization from
> > the output of OverlayNG (did the old overlay normalize internally ?)
> 
> No, neither normalizes, it's wasted overhead except in testing. Things just come out of the graphs in different orders.

Well the result seem to be compatible, just different order,
so this case could be threated like the other ones of expecting
different results based on GEOS version.

--strk;


More information about the geos-devel mailing list