[geos-devel] Having a real site? and fixing doxygen

[Paul Ramsey]

I have the beginnings of a separate site on a branch. I was honestly planning on hosting on GH pages. There is a solid purpose to a separate site, as a clean place for examples and documentation beyond just header doco and doxygen. 

> On Aug 22, 2021, at 11:16 PM, Regina Obe <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:
> 
> Right now GEOS does not have a real site.
> 
> geos.osgeo.org  is sitting on OSGeo6, which the index page simply redirects
> to trac.osgeo.org/geos.
> The snapshot and doxygen build was done under pramsey's account on osgeo6
> and that's the only thing that is hosted on geos.osgeo.org (which is on
> osgeo6).
> 
> This is all fine except for the fact I want to get rid of osgeo6 (or at
> least move all project related stuff off of it so it's just dedicated to
> mailman).
> It also has a cmake that is older than what we support (Cmake 3.7 vs. our
> minimal 3.8 for main branch). Though I guess that will be fixed when I
> upgrade osgeo6 to buster in a couple of months.
> 
> I have this ticket in place - https://trac.osgeo.org/geos/ticket/1123 Which
> I'd like some feedback on.
> 
> The big thing that is sorely missed is our doxygen build which someone
> already complained about a couple months ago.
> The daily snapshots I'm guessing most people can use that generated by our
> git or git mirrors.
> 
> What are people's thoughts.  
> 
> 1) Is there a benefit to having a dedicated website for geos? 
> 2) Alternatively could just have Jenkins build the doxygen as part of
> regression run and be the redirector to trac.
> 
> Thanks,
> Regina
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel