[geos-devel] JTS Harmony

[Paul Ramsey]

> On Feb 18, 2022, at 4:15 PM, Andrew Bell <andrew.bell.ia at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Has the attitude about keeping the codebase in sync with the JTS code changed? I would potentially do some work on this project if this isn't a requirement -- it seemed difficult to make changes that would make the code more accessible with strict adherence to the JTS structure.
> 
> Sorry if this isn't the right thread for this question.

I think a new thread title makes sense.

I guess it depends a lot on what those changes are, because one thing we don't want is making porting out of JTS a whole pile harder. 

Is that a strict restriction, or something else?

P.