[geotk] [Fwd: Re: OSGeo incubation committee meeting agenda]

[Adrian Custer]

[List options were mis-configured to reject postings from non-members]

-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Arnulf Christl <arnulf.christl at wheregroup.com>
Reply-to: arnulf.christl at wheregroup.com
To: Adrian Custer <adrian.custer at geomatys.fr>, desruisseaux at geomatys.fr
Cc: Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at pobox.com>, list, Geotoolkit
<geotoolkit at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: OSGeo incubation committee meeting agenda
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 21:06:23 +0200 (CEST)

On Thu, May 21, 2009 19:40, Adrian Custer wrote:
> Hello both,
>
>
> I noticed you have scheduled an upcoming meeting of the incubation
> committee of OSGeo from a mail sent to that list. I wonder if it is
> necessary to add an agenda item for consideration of new projects or is
> that an item that comes up at every meeting regardless of the published
> agenda?

Hello,
I sent a mail to IncCom wrt. graduating OSSIM and pointing to the next
board meeting. As far as I can tell there is no Incubation Committee
meeting planned yet. But it may be time to have one as there have not been
any Incubation Committee meetings lately and there are several topics that
need to be discussed. Frank - do you feel like making it happen? If you
are full I can do that too, just drop me a note.

> Also, it does not seem that any mail has been sent out to the incubator
> list announcing the pending application of Geotoolkit. Is this necessary or
> are the Trac ticket (http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/362) and wiki page
> enough? I did just notice that you are using the 'application' keyword so
> I added that to the ticket just today.

I guess this should be enough, all interested parties will for sure have
seen it by now. At least from my perspective this application creates a
precedence in that it is the fork of a graduated project and we should
discuss this on the incubation mailing list.

Adrian,
thanks for bringing this up again.

Arnulf.

> Thanks,
> --adrian