[GRASS-SVN] r59877 - in grass-promo/grassposter/2014_EGU_M3_Landscape: . images

[svn_grass at osgeo.org]

Author: ychemin
Date: 2014-04-21 05:36:50 -0700 (Mon, 21 Apr 2014)
New Revision: 59877

Added:
   grass-promo/grassposter/2014_EGU_M3_Landscape/images/Clem_FeO_area.png
   grass-promo/grassposter/2014_EGU_M3_Landscape/images/M3_Zhang_FeO_area.png
Modified:
   grass-promo/grassposter/2014_EGU_M3_Landscape/Makefile
   grass-promo/grassposter/2014_EGU_M3_Landscape/poster.tex
Log:
updated poster

Modified: grass-promo/grassposter/2014_EGU_M3_Landscape/Makefile
===================================================================
--- grass-promo/grassposter/2014_EGU_M3_Landscape/Makefile	2014-04-21 12:01:48 UTC (rev 59876)
+++ grass-promo/grassposter/2014_EGU_M3_Landscape/Makefile	2014-04-21 12:36:50 UTC (rev 59877)
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 FILE=poster
 SVGDIR = svg_images
-CODE = code
+CODEDIR = code
 
 SVGFILES = $(shell ls $(SVGDIR)/*.svg)
 SVGPDF = $(patsubst %.svg, %.pdf, $(SVGFILES))
-CODE = $(shell ls $(CODE)/*.tex)
-CODEPDF = $(patsubst %.tex, %.pdf, $(CODE))
+CODEFILES = $(shell ls $(CODEDIR)/*.tex)
+CODEPDF = $(patsubst %.tex, %.pdf, $(CODEFILES))
 
 
 all: $(FILE).pdf
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
 $(SVGPDF): %.pdf: %.svg
 	inkscape -z --export-pdf=$@ --export-area-drawing --export-dpi=300 $<
 
-$(CODEPDF): %.pdf: %.tex
-	pdflatex -shell-escape -output-directory=$(CODE) $< 
+#$(CODEPDF): %.pdf: %.tex
+#	pdflatex -shell-escape -output-directory=$(CODEDIR) $< 
 
 clean:
 	rm -f *~ *.aux *.log *.out *.toc *.bbl *.blg *-blx.bib *.ps

Added: grass-promo/grassposter/2014_EGU_M3_Landscape/images/Clem_FeO_area.png
===================================================================
(Binary files differ)


Property changes on: grass-promo/grassposter/2014_EGU_M3_Landscape/images/Clem_FeO_area.png
___________________________________________________________________
Added: svn:mime-type
   + application/octet-stream

Added: grass-promo/grassposter/2014_EGU_M3_Landscape/images/M3_Zhang_FeO_area.png
===================================================================
(Binary files differ)


Property changes on: grass-promo/grassposter/2014_EGU_M3_Landscape/images/M3_Zhang_FeO_area.png
___________________________________________________________________
Added: svn:mime-type
   + application/octet-stream

Modified: grass-promo/grassposter/2014_EGU_M3_Landscape/poster.tex
===================================================================
--- grass-promo/grassposter/2014_EGU_M3_Landscape/poster.tex	2014-04-21 12:01:48 UTC (rev 59876)
+++ grass-promo/grassposter/2014_EGU_M3_Landscape/poster.tex	2014-04-21 12:36:50 UTC (rev 59877)
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@
 \begin{center}
  \includegraphics[width=0.75\textwidth]{./images/Clementine}
  \newline
- Figure 1: Clementine RGB153 (top), segmentation (middle) and FeO (wt\%) per segmentation class (bottom).
+ Figure 2: Clementine RGB153 (top), segmentation (middle) and FeO (wt\%) per segmentation class (bottom).
 \end{center}
 }
 
@@ -187,8 +187,19 @@
 \end{tabular}
 \end{center}
 \noindent Upon using the  Lawrence et al. (2002) equation, it turned out that though the wt\%FeO range was satisfactory for few crater points, the rate of change was actually reverse to the expected one, reducing to null towards the South of the landing site and increasing towards the North.\newline
-\noindent The equation from Zhang et al. (2013) is giving an appropriate rate of change, however, the local values are too large compared to the Clementine derived FeO values.\newline
+\noindent The equation from Zhang et al. (2013) is giving an appropriate rate of change, however, the local values are too large compared to the Clementine derived FeO values. Comparing the zonal contrast between Clementine FeO map from Lucey et al. (2000) the $M^3$ from Zhang et al. (2013) leads to an interesting prospect as even the shapes are not consistent (see Figures ~\ref{fig:subfeoclem} \& ~\ref{fig:subfeoM3}). This indicates that the inner work of the angle equation is not sensitive to the same type of distance between R950 and R750 as they are in Clementine and in $M^3$. In an ideal condition, the calibration of both sensor bands would be identical, and the sensor response for each band would also be the same. This is not a reality, from the design and manufacture inheritance of multi-spectral sensors and hyperspectral sensors, to the data collection flight and its environment. Finally, some accident or issues can damage the operation.\newline
 
+\begin{center}
+ \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth,keepaspectratio=true]{./images/Clem_FeO_area}
+% \caption{Subset of Clementine FeO using \citep{lucey2000lunar}}
+ \label{fig:subfeoclem}
+\hspace{5mm}
+ \includegraphics[width=0.435\textwidth,keepaspectratio=true]{./images/M3_Zhang_FeO_area}
+% \caption{Subset of $M^3$ FeO using \cite{zhang2013mapping}}
+ \label{fig:subfeoM3}
+\end{center}
+
+
 }