LOCAL delivery error

Local delivery agent Postmaster at bgcict.bitnet
Sun Feb 6 15:56:03 EST 1994


Note: this message was generated automatically.

The following error(s) occurred during local delivery of your message.

Error in delivery to user RSGISBG:
    retry count exceeded
Message follows.

Received: from UIUCVMD (MAILER) by bgcict.bitnet (MX V3.1) with Jnet; Thu, 03 Fe
b 1994 18:09:43 +0200
Return-Path: <@VMD.CSO.UIUC.EDU:grass-lists-owner at MAX.CECER.ARMY.MIL>
Received: from UIUCVMD (NJE origin SMTP at UIUCVMD) by VMD.CSO.UIUC.EDU (LMail V1.1
d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 5203; Thu, 3 Feb 1994 09:22:54 -0600
Received: from max.cecer.army.mil by vmd.cso.uiuc.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with TC
P; Thu, 03 Feb 94 09:22:51 CST
Received: from amber.cecer.army.mil by max.cecer.army.mil with SMTP id AA16285 (
5.67a/IDA-1.5 for <rsgisbg at BGCICT.BITNET>); Thu, 3 Feb 1994 11:21:35 -0600
Received: from max.cecer.army.mil by amber.cecer.army.mil (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA090
88; Thu, 3 Feb 94 09:15:17 CST
Received: from zorro.cecer.army.mil by max.cecer.army.mil with SMTP id AA16157 (
5.67a/IDA-1.5 for <grassp-people at max.cecer.army.mil>); Thu, 3 Feb 1994 11:16:48
-0600
Received: from amber.cecer.army.mil by zorro.cecer.army.mil with SMTP id AA01874
 (5.67a/IDA-1.4.4 for <grassp-people>); Thu, 3 Feb 1994 09:14:12 -0600
Received: from max.cecer.army.mil by amber.cecer.army.mil (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA090
82; Thu, 3 Feb 94 09:14:10 CST
Received: from nettle.ecn.purdue.edu by max.cecer.army.mil with SMTP id AA16136
(5.67a/IDA-1.5 for <grassp-list at max.cecer.army.mil>); Thu, 3 Feb 1994 11:16:09 -
0600
Received: by nettle.ecn.purdue.edu (5.65/1.32jrs) id AA08186; Thu, 3 Feb 94 10:1
4:04 -0500
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 1994 10:14:04 -0500 
Message-ID: <9402031514.AA08186 at nettle.ecn.purdue.edu>
From: James Darrell McCauley <mccauley at ecn.purdue.edu>
Sender: mccauley at ecn.purdue.edu
Sender: grass-lists-owner at max.cecer.army.mil
Reply-To: grassp-list at max.cecer.army.mil
Precedence: Bulk
Sender: grass-lists-owner at moon.cecer.army.mil.
Reply-To: grassp-list at moon.cecer.army.mil.
Precedence: Bulk
To: grassp-list at max.cecer.army.mil
In-Reply-To: <9402031417.AA21197 at niwot>
Subject: Re: ALTEK DIGITIZER DRIVER

Ronald Thomas (ront at niwot.CFNR.ColoState.EDU) writes on 3 Feb 94:
>PK -- We have the same setup, running GRASS4.1 on a SPARCclassic with
>Solaris 2.2:  and no v.digit.  We have had to keep an old workstation
>(SUN 386i) active runnig GRASS4.0 & SunOS 4.0.2 in order to run the
>digitizer.  This subject was brought up before on the lists, but never
>resolved.  I'm not sure if it is a SOLARIS 2.x problem or a GRASS 4.1
>problem.

>v.digit runs like a DOG in "no digitizer" mode, something to do with
>the fifo's and SOLARIS, I've been told.  Does your v.digit run without

it's dogish even when using a digitizer because it still communicates
with the display. We don't have an ALTEK but a CALCOMP, and the new
v.digit works well with this under 4.1.x (not 2.x). These seems to
indicate that the problem may be with Solaris and/or the something
specific to the altek. We just recently moved everything to 2.3, but I
haven't had a chance to try it yet.

The "puck must be on the pad" problem has/had to do with the way
that the software are designed. I thought that this was fixed, but
maybe not.

Another possible reason for v.digit problems that I gathered from sun
gurus was that the serial port interface was supposedly changed on
newer machines.  I can't confirm or deny that this is the problem (I
lean towards the latter), but only offer it as another possibility.

>Also, I think v.digit was changed in GRASS4.1, and there is a "v.digit2" or
>"v.digit.old" code around which is the GRASS4.0 v.digit -- can anyone
>shed some light on this?  Has ANYONE got an ALTEK AC31 running WELL on

you're correct. The old v.digit is not v.digit2. As I recall,
instructions for using the older one are at the end of the installation
guide.

--Darrell







More information about the grass-dev mailing list