[GRASS5] [firstname.lastname@example.org: Re: grass autoconf]
neteler at geog.uni-hannover.de
Tue May 2 06:45:12 EDT 2000
On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 08:53:00AM -0400, Eric Mitchell wrote:
> > If GRASS will be split into several subpackages, it will be complicated
> > to track all dependencies. You will have to do some
> > scripting/programming to get the right libraries with the packages.
> It would probably be best/easiest to just include all the libraries
> with the "base" package. Splitting grass into several subpackages
> will require some assumptions as far as dealing with interpackage
> dependencies. There are many ways of dealing with these dependencies,
> but all of them have some drawbacks.
I agree. We should have a package
"GRASS-CORE" or "GRASS-BASE" including *all* libraries.
> > I would vote for a step-by-step approach. If the autoconf system works,
> > we could discuss again if it is worth the effort.
> I should be able to do some preliminary autoconf work over
> the next week or so. I'll keep you posted.
we stay tuned!
If you want to unsubscribe from GRASS Development
Team internal mailing list write to:
minordomo at geog.uni-hannover.de with
subject 'unsubscribe grass5'
More information about the grass-dev