[GRASS5] Re: [GRASSLIST:1775] r.in.bin

[Glynn Clements]

Bob Covill wrote:

> I am not sure I know what the bug is that is being described above. It
> sounds like there might be a problem with how the signed integers are
> converted. This was a routine that I took from the original r.in.bin and
> never really tested too much. 
> 
> However, if it works with one projection and not another (XY & Lat Lon),
> then there is probably something else wrong.
> 
> Have you applied your fix to the CVS yet Glynn? If not you could email
> it to me and I will take a look to see if something jogs my memory.

My fix doesn't fix Jan-Oliver's problem (negative altitudes in an x-y
location).

All I did was to change the parameter-handling logic so that the case
where you specify all six of N/S/E/W/rows/cols worked (I couldn't
correctly import into a lat-long location without this).

-- 
Glynn Clements <glynn.clements at virgin.net>

---------------------------------------- 
If you want to unsubscribe from GRASS Development Team mailing list write to:
minordomo at geog.uni-hannover.de with
subject 'unsubscribe grass5'