CVS analysis (Re: [GRASS5] Time to go mad: CVS completely messed up?!)
bernhard at intevation.de
Tue Aug 14 13:40:39 EDT 2001
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 07:24:56PM +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 06:11:31PM +0100, Glynn Clements wrote:
> > Bear in mind that any information regarding the
> > releasebranch_11_april_2001_5_0_0 tag may be completely bogus. If my
> > suspicion is correct, the repository has been tagged twice with this
> > tag.
> I am still in the process of inquiring.
> Please _hold_ to commit changes to the CVS,
> until we can find out what has happened.
> Glynn: It looks like your suspicion might be correct.
> According to the following output,
> a command which everybody can use to find out about the
> Tags and Branches of a file without checking out the file,
> "releasebranch_11_april_2001_5_0_0" is not a branch.
> $ cvs -z2 status -v main.c
> Existing Tags:
> releasebranch_14_august_2001_5_0_0 (branch: 1.3.4)
> releasebranch_11_april_2001_5_0_0 (revision: 1.3)
With other files it is, e.g:
cvs status -v grass/README
releasebranch_14_august_2001_5_0_0 (branch: 1.12.4)
release_grass500pre1_20_may_2001 (revision: 1.12)
devices_cleanup_20000420 (revision: 1.12)
releasebranch_11_april_2001_5_0_0 (branch: 1.12.2)
Now I will dig into the history command options to find out
what actions caused this behaviour.
Professional Service around Free Software (intevation.net)
The FreeGIS Project (freegis.org)
Association for a Free Informational Infrastructure (ffii.org)
FSF Europe (fsfeurope.org)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 248 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20010814/531c0296/attachment.bin
More information about the grass-dev