[GRASS5] GRASS 5.0/5.1
Markus Neteler
neteler at geog.uni-hannover.de
Thu Jan 18 10:55:05 EST 2001
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 11:03:10AM +0700, Justin Hickey wrote:
> Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote:
> > I vote for a beta11 as soon as possible.
> > It will be definitely better than beta10
> > and will generate reports on serious problems.
>
> Agreed.
>
> > drop buggy modules where no one says he/she will fix it within 4
> > weeks.
>
> I think this would be a good idea. However, are there any well used
> modules that are broken? If so, then we should at least fix those.
Yes,
o the r.*.tiff is still causing some problems. Eric Miller
already spend much time on this pretty confusing piece of code,
however there are still problems.
r.in.tiff: segfault on Linux (was working once)
r.out.tiff: minor bug on extensions if -t is used (segfaults when
writing the .tfw file on Linux
This is in my opinion such an important module.
o CELL driver: obviously some problems with colors (no 24bit)
o r.in.png: unstable, no 24bit yet
o v.out.e00: Doesn't output any information about projection, datum, etc.
The import/export functionality is one of the most important issues
in a GIS (here: acceptance of GRASS beside other stuff of course).
On BUGS:
- I have decreased the bugs status here:
- r.contour: no RC (shall we keep it?)
- r.cost: here is is working well
- r.null: I have added the comment to html/html/r.null.html
and removed in BUGS.
Recent new bug: GRASS 5 beta10 startup crash occurs with Linux and csh.
So far,
Markus
----------------------------------------
If you want to unsubscribe from GRASS Development Team mailing list write to:
minordomo at geog.uni-hannover.de with
subject 'unsubscribe grass5'
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list