[GRASS5] Proposed process for GRASS reorganization (please read)
B. Byars
Bruce_Byars at baylor.edu
Fri Mar 23 15:21:20 EST 2001
> If we implement this 6 will be radically different than 1-5. It would be a fresh start (which from what I've seen is a little overdue).
Well, this is all voluntary on the part of the dev team, so no one keeps a commercial
development schedule. The old CERL schedule was a new version every two years
or so. That's what has been retained and will be retained. Moving too fast risks
making mistakes. Especially when not everyone is centrally located.
> In no way did I want to imply this proposal is directly related to GRASS 5 efforts, but what other forum could I bring it up?
>
> Obviously this doesn't effect current GRASS 5 efforts. Perhaps I should have made that clear from the beginning.
All good points to consider.
Bruce
----------------------------------------
If you want to unsubscribe from GRASS Development Team mailing list write to:
minordomo at geog.uni-hannover.de with
subject 'unsubscribe grass5'
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list