[GRASS5] GRASS stable/exp branches
Radim Blazek
Radim.Blazek at dhv.cz
Sun Mar 4 03:08:14 EST 2001
Hi Justin and all,
> > I am probably missing something but if we say that only bugfixes will
> > go into grass5.0.x and grass51 is already established in NEW
> > repository (RESTRUCTURED:
> > http://freegis.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/grass51/ ),
> > I don't see why we need branches (at this moment and in at least next
> > year)
>
> Well, if you check this part of the tree, it is almost empty with only a
> few modules there (the new vector format I think). Until we actually
> create the new directory structure, and move the modules to their new
> locations, then the 5.1 tree is unusable for development on current
> modules.
When do you think development in 5.1 will be started (event + date)?
Yes, 5.1 is almost empty and it will always be until we start there.
Will be new features commited into 5.0 (devel branch) released in some 5.0.x?
Why:
5.0b11 - -> 5.0.0 -> 5.0.1 -> ... (stable)
\ ^ ^
-> devel branch - -> stop
\
-> 5.1 -> x -> 5.1 ->
instead of:
5.0b11 - -> 5.0.0 -> 5.0.1 -> ... (stable)
\
-> 5.1 ->
> However, brand new modules can be added there (although with
> great care, since the new structure is not finalized).
>
> So, while most of us are working on bug fixes (hopefully) for the stable
> branch. Updates can still be made to the existing modules through the
> main branch. If we don't branch, then something like what happened for
> beta 11 (code was committed during pre-testing) can occur. The branch is
> just an extra precaution to try and prevent this type of error.
Radim
----------------------------------------
If you want to unsubscribe from GRASS Development Team mailing list write to:
minordomo at geog.uni-hannover.de with
subject 'unsubscribe grass5'
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list