Issue-Tracker for 5.1.x? (was: [GRASS5] Release Management (10 days to go before Freeze))

[Bernhard Reiter]

Haven't gotten any feedback about this.
Do you think it would be wise to have an issue tracker for the
development series of grass?  
This would mean for grass5.1.x and later grass5.3.x.

The issues tracker there would be different from the
ones tracked in the grass queue responsible for the stable series.

We could call the queue "grass-dev".
(And I also guess that we at Intevation think about migrating this
to the new upcoming roundup issue tracker, when we set it up.)

Would the developers want this?

Otherwise I think we need an area for grass5.1, 
but or "close" or "stall" all bugs that aim for the development version.

	Bernhard


On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 03:58:50PM +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 01:34:28PM +0100, Glynn Clements wrote:
> > Also, I'm not sure that this one really belongs in the RT:
> > #942	GRASS 5.1: prequisites for compiling
> 
> You are right in that it is not a GRASS5.0.x bug.
> To reflect this I've downgraded its priority.
> 
> We have to think if we want to create areas in this queue 
> for GRASS5.1.x issues.  Or maybe an entirely new queue?
> We could also have people mail issues about the development versions
> directly to the list.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 248 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20020418/4f0c7cf7/attachment.bin