[GRASS5] Glynn: Please branch. Rest: Hold Committs.

[Bernhard Reiter]

On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 01:41:25PM +0200, Markus Neteler wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 06:49:21PM +0100, Glynn Clements wrote:

> just curious, did you somewhat consider the former release branch for
> the selection of modules?
> 
> Eg. the G3D tools are inside which does not make much
> sense except for s.vol.rst. Other modules I didn't
> verify yet.

We still have to do this before we make the tarball.
You are the coordinator, we need your assistance with this. :)

> Then:
> - how to handle NEWS.html? It will fork, right?

Yes.
As I see it, this is the wanted behaviour, right?

> - how to handle the html/ files - we should delete all modules
>   descriptions not available in the release branch (also update
>   the related overview pages)

I agree.
Though we can also agree to not put them in the tarball,
whatever creates less overhead work.

> Am I right that a merge back won't happen this time? 

This is the plan.

> Otherwise we would loose again new contributions 
> to the development tree (HEAD).

We are not planing this, but if we did, this would be 
a question of how to organise the merge.
Usually you do not loose anything with CVS.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 248 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20020429/119080c1/attachment.bin