[GRASS5] Objections to release 5.0.0stable?

[Bernhard Reiter]

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 12:38:40AM -0700, Alex Shevlakov wrote:
> 
> --- Markus Neteler <neteler at itc.it> wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 09:36:51PM +0100, Glynn
> > Clements wrote:
> 
> My opinion is that i18n changes should be there,
> otherwise
> grass WILL lose a certain amount of potential nls
> users which is less harmless then having fixes tested
> more than once included in stable release,

We can release it as a patch first and a 5.0.1 or so later.
Cetainly not a release critical fix.
I also think it should be left out for now.

Note that it's great that you've developed this addition.
We will have it in GRASS. It's just that it is too risky for the
first stable release in years.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20020812/94e64167/attachment.bin