bug #783: nviz segmentation violation (was [GRASS5] nviz / tcl compile problem)
bernhard at intevation.de
Thu Feb 14 10:12:18 EST 2002
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 02:27:17PM +0100, Markus Neteler wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:28:17PM +0100, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> >We can offer a convinient package
> >with the headers, but the base line has to be that this is not GRASS' fault.
> do you think of providing a tcl/tk binaries package including the
> additional header file? That's not fully clear to me.
If tcl/tk binary packages miss these headers,
that is bug on their side. So we tell people:
This is a fault of the binary package maintainers!
Then we can create tarballs for each of the most common
tcl/tk binary packages to easily add these headers and tell people:
For your convinience we occasionally package
these missing header files for some tcl/tk binary
packages as add on package: Check ...
> If yes, it will be another dependency for GRASS as the standard
> tcl/tk package delivered on Linux distros would be needed to be replaced.
We should avoid this at any costs.
> You also had to prepare such a package for all the architectures and
> OSes, right?
Instead of making them official part of GRASS,
we just packages the header files. We would not need to do anything
more than what we would need to do when we add it as official part
of GRASS. Because we do no promisse to support all tcl/tk packages,
it would save us efforts.
> If we "just" add the missing header files to NVIZ, we are at least
> compliant up to tcl/tk8.3.
This would be flawed by design.
To "just" add the missing header we somehow get some sort of
responsibility that this works. We also dublicate work and add a
workaround for a bug that should be fixed at the cause.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 248 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20020214/aeac0bc0/attachment.bin
More information about the grass-dev