Bernhard Reiter wrote: > > #1034 r.in.tiff segfaults > > Eric reported that this should now be fixed. > > Looks like this change made in the CVS in May. Is it in the pre5 > release then we could contact the requestor and ask for retesting. src/raster/r.tiff is identical in pre5 and the head. -- Glynn Clements <glynn.clements at virgin.net>