[GRASS5] Re: [GRASS-CVS] bernhard: grass SUBMITTING,1.21,1.22

[Bernhard Reiter]

As you can see a slightly adapted version of syncmail 
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/cvs-syncmail/)
is running on the GRASS cvs server now.

It only generates emails for the modules web and grass right now.
Do you want commit messages for all modules?


On the topic above: I still believe that we should put ID 
tags in files. The statement that this makes problems with
branches does not seem to be completly correct.

	Bernhard

On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 08:42:36PM +0200, grass at intevation.de wrote:
> 
> Author: bernhard
> 
> Update of /grassrepository/grass
> In directory doto:/tmp/cvs-serv8822
> 
> Modified Files:
> 	SUBMITTING 
> Log Message:
> SUBMITTING: added a "(?)" because the rule seems strange and I
> 		want to test the new syncmail.
> 
> 
> Index: SUBMITTING
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /grassrepository/grass/SUBMITTING,v
> retrieving revision 1.21
> retrieving revision 1.22
> diff -u -d -r1.21 -r1.22
> --- SUBMITTING	6 Mar 2002 16:24:49 -0000	1.21
> +++ SUBMITTING	13 May 2002 18:42:34 -0000	1.22
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
>      The copyright protects your rights according to GNU General Public
>      License (www.gnu.org).
>  
> -4.  - deleted. We don't want the $ ID $ in source code any more as it
> +4.  - deleted.(?) We don't want the $ ID $ in source code any more as it
>      causes problems for the CVS branches.
>  
>  5.  To ensure that the software system continues to work, please include
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 248 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20020513/3906e71d/attachment.bin