[GRASS5] d.photo

Markus Neteler neteler at itc.it
Fri Apr 18 06:15:30 EDT 2003

On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 12:54:58AM +0100, Glynn Clements wrote:
> > d.photo is significantly faster than d.rgb:
> Some issues to consider:
> 1. d.rgb uses the maps' colour tables to obtain the intensity values,
> rather than assuming a direct translation.

what about a flag to support direct translation? Then most people
should be happy.
I don't know if this required many changes or basically some condition
for G_read_colors()?


More information about the grass-dev mailing list