[GRASS5] v.in.dwg license problem

Radim Blazek blazek at itc.it
Mon May 19 05:17:37 EDT 2003


On Friday 16 May 2003 08:02 pm, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Radim Blazek writes:
>  > Open DWG license gives more freedom to distribute v.in.dwg for free than
                                                                ^^^^^^^^ 
Radim

>  > GPL.
>
> If that was the case, then there would be no problem.  It is decidedly
> not the case, though.  The GPL allows for commercial distribution, the
> Open DWG license does not.  The GPL requires source distribution, and
> the Open DWG library doesn't come with source, and even if you pay
> $25,000, you still can't distribute the source.




More information about the grass-dev mailing list