[GRASS5] v.in.dwg license problem
Radim Blazek
blazek at itc.it
Mon May 19 05:17:37 EDT 2003
On Friday 16 May 2003 08:02 pm, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Radim Blazek writes:
> > Open DWG license gives more freedom to distribute v.in.dwg for free than
^^^^^^^^
Radim
> > GPL.
>
> If that was the case, then there would be no problem. It is decidedly
> not the case, though. The GPL allows for commercial distribution, the
> Open DWG license does not. The GPL requires source distribution, and
> the Open DWG library doesn't come with source, and even if you pay
> $25,000, you still can't distribute the source.
More information about the grass-dev
mailing list