[GRASS5] C and C++ compiler changes?

Bernhard Reiter bernhard at intevation.de
Wed Oct 22 04:36:00 EDT 2003

On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 08:05:32PM +0200, Thierry Laronde wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:22:57PM -0400, Laura Toma wrote:
> > As far as I can tell all the compile problems with r.terraflow are 
> > because of the #include lines.
> > With gcc3.2 and 3.3 all  #include <X.h> should be replaced with #include 
> > <X>.
> > Also, the header strstream.h is deprecated, and should be replaced with 
> > sstream.

I'll take it this exclusively holds for C++?
It would be interesting to get a pointer to the rationale behind it.

Anyway this is a point where I'm glad that the tradition
is to keep a lot of GRASS' code in plain C. 

> > In any case the code should be fixed to compile without warnings (and 
> > errors).. I'll  be working on it. 
> Great. All I wanted to emphasize ---since I have spent some times trying
> to convince GNU libc (latest) and GNU cc (latest) to compile smoothly
> together...--- is that we are going to have some hard time with mixes
> of different versions of gcc and glibc... And the C++ support has deeply
> changed too!

Well it is _only_ about the C++ support as far as I always understood this.
Mixing most of the plain C libraries have never been a major problem.
Am I missing something?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/attachments/20031022/e651433d/attachment.bin

More information about the grass-dev mailing list