[GRASS5] status of libgrass, mapserver, gdal and >8bit rasters
glynn.clements at virgin.net
Sun Mar 14 19:43:28 EST 2004
Markus Neteler wrote:
> I also think that we should release the GRASS libraries as stand-alone
> package in future (probably with GRASS++ libs, let's jump into the license
> discussion again...) to add more flexibility in GRASS packaging.
If you are considering releasing shared libraries as a standalone
package, we will have to start paying attention to version issues.
Specifically, each library will require a version number in its
soname, and that version number will need to increase whenever an
incompatible change is made to the library.
Glynn Clements <glynn.clements at virgin.net>
More information about the grass-dev