[GRASS5] status of libgrass, mapserver, gdal and >8bit rasters
neteler at itc.it
Mon Mar 15 03:26:36 EST 2004
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 12:43:28AM +0000, Glynn Clements wrote:
> Markus Neteler wrote:
> > I also think that we should release the GRASS libraries as stand-alone
> > package in future (probably with GRASS++ libs, let's jump into the license
> > discussion again...) to add more flexibility in GRASS packaging.
> If you are considering releasing shared libraries as a standalone
> package, we will have to start paying attention to version issues.
> Specifically, each library will require a version number in its
> soname, and that version number will need to increase whenever an
> incompatible change is made to the library.
Yes. Shouldn't the version number in the soname be added in
More information about the grass-dev